Hand off the processing, the recalculating, and the course-by-course evaluating. Keep the decisions.
Trusted by 110+ Colleges and Universites
Application volume is growing and manual processing capacity is fixed. These are the numbers our partners are navigating right now.
The platform does the processing. Your team keeps the decisions.
Take on deadline spikes without adding readers. Transcripts arrive in every format a high school can produce, and each one is processed the same way.
Every file is matched, keyed, and recalculated by a person. Verification of self-reported data starts after decisions go out.
Files arrive matched, read, and ready for export to your CRM. Verification happens as soon as documents are received.
Stony Brook went from 37,000 to 64,000 applications in five years without adding headcount.
"When we were looking at other solutions, everyone was using outdated OCR software. We did not think that would help us long term."
Answer what counts for a prospective student with 60 credits from two community colleges, before another college or university answers first.
Prospects email for an estimate. Admitted students wait weeks. Last cycle's equivalency lives in a thread, so it gets decided again.
Prospects get an unofficial evaluation in minutes. Admitted transcripts match the equivalencies you already hold. New courses reach the right reviewer, and the decision is kept.
Decide each equivalency once. Every later applicant with that course gets the same answer.
“Students had to send the same information multiple places to get ideally the same answer, and sometimes they were getting different answers.”
Compare applicants on the same terms. Every transcript arrives with a different scale, a different weighting, and a different idea of what counts as core.
Each GPA is rebuilt by hand, one transcript at a time, usually in a manual spreadsheet.
Every transcript arrives with your GPAs already computed, identically for every applicant, with the courses that counted shown next to the number.
Texas Tech surfaced 504 high-achieving students that manual review had missed, and 51+ confirmed Fall 2025 deposits trace back to them.
“You’re using your 10-key all day, and you go home and see numbers flashing across your eyes. My fingers would twitch at the dinner table.”
All student PII is handled under FERPA and protected by SOC 2 Type II controls, in tenant-isolated storage.

.avif)
.avif)
.avif)
.avif)
.avif)
Bring the workflow that's slowing you down and we'll show you what it looks like here.
Your admissions team was hired to make decisions. Not to recalculate GPAs.
Connect with UsMost start with the one under the most pressure. Admissions operations usually begin with first-year application processing; registrars begin with course-by-course credit evaluation. The same rules and integrations carry across, so the second workflow is configuration, not a new implementation.
Every equivalency decision your institution has made lives in one shared record. EddyDB recommends the next match from your own policies, then routes the course to the right faculty reviewer. Faculty approve or deny, and every action is logged with reviewer identity, timestamp, and status.
Yes. EdVisorly encodes your institution's own formulas rather than a generic standard: cumulative, core, STEM, math, and academic GPA, plus scale conversions such as semester to quarter. Configure once and every workflow applies the same logic.
Both. High school transcripts for first-year review, college transcripts for transfer credit, on the same rules and integrations. Institutions often start with one and expand.
Yes. EddyNavigate evaluations are labelled unofficial, returned to the prospective student, and never enter the registrar’s official queue.
No. EdVisorly connects to the SIS and admissions CRM you already run, including Banner, PeopleSoft, Colleague, and Slate. You push documents to us; we write structured data back. Your system of record stays where it is.