AI ENROLLMENT PLATFORM USE CASES

How Admissions and Registrars automate their transcript queue

Hand off the processing, the recalculating, and the course-by-course evaluating. Keep the decisions.

>99% processing accuracy

Trusted by 110+ Colleges and Universites

Stony Brook University logo
Drexel University logo
Arcadia University logo
University of Alabama logo
University of the Pacific logo
Sonoma University logo
Lurleen B. Wallace University logo
Emerson College logo
Stony Brook University logo
Drexel University logo
Arcadia University logo
University of Alabama logo
University of the Pacific logo
Sonoma University logo
Lurleen B. Wallace University logo
Emerson College logo
Where the cycle slows down

Work arrives faster than any manual process can absorb it.

Application volume is growing and manual processing capacity is fixed. These are the numbers our partners are navigating right now.

100,000+
transcripts a year. Five minutes each.
Selton Rigsby, Assistant Director Processing, Texas Tech University
Equivalency decisions living in email threads and one-off spreadsheets, across every academic college.
Carnegie Mellon University case study
73%
more applications in five years. Same team, same budget.
Christina Lofaso, Associate Director of Admissions, Stony Brook University
01
Document in
02
Analyze
03
Extract
04
Evaluate
First-Year Application
GPA Recalculation
Transfer Credit Evaluation
Your Decision

The platform does the processing. Your team keeps the decisions.

First-year application processing

Every transcript analyzed before a decision gets made

Take on deadline spikes without adding readers. Transcripts arrive in every format a high school can produce, and each one is processed the same way.

Before

Every file is matched, keyed, and recalculated by a person. Verification of self-reported data starts after decisions go out.

After

Files arrive matched, read, and ready for export to your CRM. Verification happens as soon as documents are received.

How it works?
1.
Index.
Each document is identified by student, school, and type and attached to the right student record.
2.
Read.
Every course, grade, and credit extracted, with rigor classified: AP, IB, Honors, Dual Enrollment.
3.
Score to your inputs.
Cumulative and core GPAs recalculated to your configuration; class rank and curriculum readiness added.
4.
Verify and write back.
Self-reported data is checked against the official transcript; exceptions go to staff.

Stony Brook went from 37,000 to 64,000 applications in five years without adding headcount.

"When we were looking at other solutions, everyone was using outdated OCR software. We did not think that would help us long term."

— Rich Beaty, Senior Associate Provost, Stony Brook University
Transfer Credit Evaluation

An unofficial answer before students apply. One official evaluation after.

Answer what counts for a prospective student with 60 credits from two community colleges, before another college or university answers first.

Before

Prospects email for an estimate. Admitted students wait weeks. Last cycle's equivalency lives in a thread, so it gets decided again.

After

Prospects get an unofficial evaluation in minutes. Admitted transcripts match the equivalencies you already hold. New courses reach the right reviewer, and the decision is kept.

How it works?
1.
Unofficial evaluation, before the application.
The prospect uploads a transcript on your site and gets a branded evaluation labeled unofficial. Your team gets a named lead.
2.
Read the college transcript.
Every course and credit extracted from 2-year and 4-year transcripts; general-education and upper-division requirements identified.
3.
Match to your equivalencies.
Each course is checked against every decision your institution has made; the next best match is recommended from your own policies.
4.
Faculty decide. The record keeps it.
Courses without precedent go to the assigned reviewer by secure link. Approved or denied, with who and when, written to your SIS.

Decide each equivalency once. Every later applicant with that course gets the same answer.

“Students had to send the same information multiple places to get ideally the same answer, and sometimes they were getting different answers.”

— Keith Gehres, Associate Vice Provost for Enrollment Innovation, Carnegie Mellon University
GPA Recalculation

Your recalculation policy, applied the same way to every transcript.

Compare applicants on the same terms. Every transcript arrives with a different scale, a different weighting, and a different idea of what counts as core.

Before

Each GPA is rebuilt by hand, one transcript at a time, usually in a manual spreadsheet.

After

Every transcript arrives with your GPAs already computed, identically for every applicant, with the courses that counted shown next to the number.

How it works?
1.
Configure once.
Which courses count as core, how Honors and AP weight, how repeats and semesters are treated, and any state or system requirements you apply.
2.
Classify against it.
Each extracted course is assigned to a subject and a rigor tier under your definitions, not the sending school’s.
3.
Recalculate and write back.
Cumulative, core, STEM, and academic GPAs computed, with the source courses on the file, written to your CRM.

Texas Tech surfaced 504 high-achieving students that manual review had missed, and 51+ confirmed Fall 2025 deposits trace back to them.

“You’re using your 10-key all day, and you go home and see numbers flashing across your eyes. My fingers would twitch at the dinner table.”

— Jared Nutt, Analyst, Texas Tech University
Built around the systems you already run

Works with your SIS, your admissions CRM, and your document management.

All student PII is handled under FERPA and protected by SOC 2 Type II controls, in tenant-isolated storage.

See what this looks like for your workflow.

Bring the workflow that's slowing you down and we'll show you what it looks like here.

Your admissions team was hired to make decisions. Not to recalculate GPAs.

Connect with Us

Frequently Asked Questions

Which workflow do institutions usually start with?

Heading 1

Heading 2

Heading 3

Most start with the one under the most pressure. Admissions operations usually begin with first-year application processing; registrars begin with course-by-course credit evaluation. The same rules and integrations carry across, so the second workflow is configuration, not a new implementation.

How is credit evaluation kept consistent between reviewers?

Heading 1

Heading 2

Heading 3

Every equivalency decision your institution has made lives in one shared record. EddyDB recommends the next match from your own policies, then routes the course to the right faculty reviewer. Faculty approve or deny, and every action is logged with reviewer identity, timestamp, and status.

Can EdVisorly apply our own GPA recalculation rules?

Heading 1

Heading 2

Heading 3

Yes. EdVisorly encodes your institution's own formulas rather than a generic standard: cumulative, core, STEM, math, and academic GPA, plus scale conversions such as semester to quarter. Configure once and every workflow applies the same logic.

Does this work for first-year applicants as well as transfer students?

Heading 1

Heading 2

Heading 3

Both. High school transcripts for first-year review, college transcripts for transfer credit, on the same rules and integrations. Institutions often start with one and expand.

Are unofficial evaluations kept out of the registrar’s official queue?

Heading 1

Heading 2

Heading 3

Yes. EddyNavigate evaluations are labelled unofficial, returned to the prospective student, and never enter the registrar’s official queue.

Does this replace our SIS or admissions CRM?

Heading 1

Heading 2

Heading 3

No. EdVisorly connects to the SIS and admissions CRM you already run, including Banner, PeopleSoft, Colleague, and Slate. You push documents to us; we write structured data back. Your system of record stays where it is.