
The urgency of addressing student retention has never been greater. According to the National Student Clearinghouse Research Center, the average national retention rate hovers around 75%, meaning one in four students never complete degrees at their first institution. In the post-pandemic landscape, many institutions are still struggling to recover their student retention numbers to pre-pandemic levels.
While often used interchangeably, student retention and persistence represent distinct but related concepts in higher education.
Student retention is primarily an institutional metric related to enrollment numbers. It measures the percentage of students who remain enrolled at the same institution from one academic period to another, typically from first to second year. Institutions track retention as a key performance indicator of their effectiveness in supporting student success.
Student persistence, on the other hand, refers to individual student engagement and continuation in their educational journey, regardless of institution. A student who transfers from one college to another is not "retained" by the original institution but is still "persisting" in their education.
Understanding this distinction is crucial because traditional retention measurements (year-to-year return rates) may not capture the full picture of student success. Basic statistics often fail to reveal why students leave and what interventions might have helped them stay. More nuanced data analysis is needed to develop effective retention strategies that address the real reasons students discontinue their education.
Recent data from the National Student Clearinghouse Research Center shows that student retention continues to be a significant challenge for higher education institutions. The COVID-19 pandemic created unprecedented disruptions, with many institutions experiencing sharp declines in retention rates during 2020-2021. While some recovery has occurred, many institutions have not yet returned to pre-pandemic retention levels.
Retention rates vary considerably across different types of institutions:
Emerging trends affecting student retention include:
These trends highlight the evolving nature of student retention challenges and the need for comprehensive, multi-faceted approaches to address them.
Student retention is not the responsibility of a single department but requires a coordinated institutional approach. Within the broader enrollment management structure, several key administrators play crucial roles:
Enrollment managers must balance multiple considerations when developing retention strategies:
There's also an inherent tension between selective admissions policies and providing access for diverse student populations. Institutions must determine whether to focus on admitting students most likely to persist or developing robust support systems for a broader range of students.
Effective student enrollment management systems integrate retention strategies with admissions and student success initiatives to create a seamless approach to supporting students throughout their educational journey.
Students are more likely to persist when they understand what success looks like and how to achieve it. Institutions should:
When students understand what's expected of them academically, socially, and professionally, they can more effectively navigate their college experience and stay on track toward graduation.
The transition to college represents a critical period for establishing patterns that lead to student retention. Effective orientation programs:
Research consistently shows that students who participate in comprehensive orientation programs are more likely to persist to their second year. By transferring to an out of state university or transitioning from high school to college, students face unique challenges that proper orientation can help address.
Relationships with advisors, staff, and faculty significantly impact student retention. Institutions should:
Academic advisors play a crucial role in helping students navigate curriculum requirements, select appropriate courses, and connect academic work to career goals. When students develop meaningful relationships with advisors and mentors, they gain both practical guidance and emotional support that encourages persistence.
Predictive analytics can help institutions identify struggling students before they drop out. Effective approaches include:
By leveraging data effectively, institutions can move from reactive to proactive retention strategies. Early identification of at-risk students allows for timely interventions that address specific challenges before they lead to withdrawal.
Students who feel connected to their institution are more likely to persist. Strategies to build community include:
A strong sense of belonging helps students weather the inevitable challenges of college life. When students feel they are valued members of the campus community, they develop the resilience needed to persist through difficulties.
Financial concerns remain one of the top reasons students leave college. Institutions should:
Financial education is equally important. Many students need guidance on budgeting, understanding loan obligations, and managing expenses. Helping students understand the long-term value of completing their degree can also motivate persistence despite financial challenges.
Today's students often juggle multiple responsibilities beyond academics. Flexible options support retention by:
Flexibility acknowledges the diverse needs of modern students and removes barriers to attendance and completion. When institutions adapt to students' life circumstances rather than expecting students to conform to traditional models, retention improves.
Families can provide crucial support for student success when properly engaged. Institutions should:
This partnership is especially important during students' critical first year when they are establishing independence while still benefiting from family support. Clear boundaries that respect student privacy while engaging families appropriately can create a powerful support network.
Community colleges face unique retention challenges because student success often means helping them successfully transfer to 4-year institutions. For many community college students, the goal is not to remain at the two-year institution but to use it as a stepping stone toward a bachelor's degree.
Effective community college retention strategies include:
Technology solutions like EdVisorly address these challenges by providing AI-powered transfer credit evaluation, university connection tools, and streamlined application processes that help community college students navigate the complex transfer journey. By partnering with transfer-focused technology solutions, community colleges can build stronger university partnerships and demonstrate improved transfer outcomes—all of which contribute to institutional retention metrics and student success.
To evaluate the effectiveness of retention initiatives, institutions should track multiple metrics:
Graduation Rates: The ultimate measure of retention success is degree completion. Institutions should track both 4-year and 6-year graduation rates to understand the full picture of student progression.
Year-to-Year Retention Analysis: Breaking down retention by year helps identify critical transition points where students are most likely to leave.
Course Completion Rates: The percentage of students successfully completing courses, particularly gateway courses in the first year, can predict longer-term retention.
Credit Accumulation: Students who consistently earn credits at the rate needed for on-time graduation are more likely to persist.
Student Satisfaction: Regular surveys measuring student engagement and satisfaction provide early indicators of retention challenges.
Equity Gaps: Analyzing retention rates across different student populations helps identify where additional support may be needed.
Gathering regular feedback through polls and surveys allows institutions to address issues quickly and refine their approaches. The most effective assessment strategies combine quantitative metrics with qualitative feedback to provide a comprehensive understanding of the student experience.
Technology platforms and tools have become essential components of effective student retention strategies. When implemented thoughtfully, technology can:
Student engagement platforms offer significant benefits for monitoring the student body, creating customizable experiences for advisors and students, and enabling targeted communications instead of generic messages.
For institutions focused on transfer student populations, specialized platforms like EdVisorly combine AI-powered transcript processing with student engagement tools that connect prospective transfer students directly with admissions teams. With capabilities like automated transfer credit evaluations and 99.3% AI accuracy, these platforms free staff from manual data entry so they can invest more time in high-impact student interactions.
However, it's important to remember that technology should complement, not replace, human connections in retention strategies. The most effective approaches use technology to enhance personal interactions rather than substitute for them.
Effective student retention requires a comprehensive, institution-wide approach that addresses the diverse needs of today's students. The strategies outlined in this guide—from clear expectations and strong advising to data analytics and flexible options—provide a framework for developing retention initiatives that support student success.
Institutions should recognize that improving student retention is not just about maintaining enrollment numbers but about fulfilling the educational mission of helping students achieve their academic and career goals. By investing in retention, colleges and universities demonstrate their commitment to the students they serve.
As you assess your current retention efforts against the strategies presented here, consider which areas offer the greatest opportunity for improvement at your institution. Remember that sustainable improvements in student retention typically require both data-driven decision-making and personalized student support.
The future of higher education depends on our ability to help students not just access college but successfully complete their degrees. By prioritizing student retention, institutions can make a lasting difference in the lives of their students and the vitality of their communities.
For community colleges and universities focused on improving transfer student outcomes, EdVisorly offers a comprehensive platform that combines AI-powered transcript processing, transfer credit evaluation, and university connection tools. Our technology helps institutions track student progress throughout the transfer journey, build stronger university partnerships, and demonstrate improved transfer outcomes.
With EdVisorly's student-centered approach, you can provide your transfer students with the clarity and support they need while freeing your staff from manual processes to focus on meaningful student interactions. Discover how our platform can transform your transfer student retention efforts and help more students achieve their educational goals.
Learn more about EdVisorly's solutions for community colleges or explore our university partnerships today.
Student retention refers to an institution's ability to keep enrolled students progressing toward graduation rather than leaving before completing their degree. College student retention is typically measured as the percentage of new students who return for their second year, though institutions also track persistence through graduation. High student retention rates indicate that students are satisfied, supported, and successfully navigating their academic journey. The opposite of retention is attrition—when students leave an institution permanently. Understanding retention helps universities identify what's working in their support systems and where improvements are needed for long-term success.
When a student is retained, it means they have continued their enrollment at the same institution from one academic period to the next—most commonly from freshman to sophomore year. This is distinct from a stop-out, which occurs when a student temporarily pauses their education with the intention of returning later. Retained students contribute positively to student retention rates and are more likely to complete their degree. For new students especially, being retained through the critical first year signals successful adjustment to campus culture, academic expectations, and social integration.
Student retention is a shared responsibility across the entire institution. Key stakeholders include academic advisors, student success staff, faculty, financial aid offices, and campus leadership. Admissions teams also play a role by ensuring new students are well-matched to the institution from the start—platforms like EdVisorly help by giving admissions staff deeper insights into transfer students' academic backgrounds, enabling better outreach and support from day one. Student affairs contributes through programming that strengthens campus culture, while career services connect students to LinkedIn networking and professional development opportunities that reinforce long-term success and degree completion motivation.
Improving college student retention requires a proactive, data-driven approach. Effective strategies include early outreach to at-risk students, strengthening academic support services, and building an inclusive campus culture where students feel they belong. Institutions should analyze case studies of successful retention programs and implement targeted interventions for different student populations. Reducing stop-out rates requires addressing common departure reasons like financial hardship, academic struggles, or poor institutional fit. For transfer students specifically, using enrollment technology like EdVisorly helps ensure students understand credit transferability before enrolling—reducing frustration and attrition that occurs when new students discover unexpected degree requirement gaps.